AVG Internet Security uses the same scan engine as Avast (both belong to the Gen Digital group) and therefore offers comparable protection at a slightly lower entry price. The suite covers up to 10 devices and scores well for easy setup. For users who want a no-frills solution without complexity, AVG is a solid choice – especially when budget matters.
AVG vs Panda Security
AVG and Panda Security compared side by side: protection, performance, pricing, and features. Which antivirus suits you better?
Panda Dome Advanced takes a cloud-based approach that minimizes local system load. The suite offers solid virus protection, web protection, and a built-in VPN. The biggest advantage is pricing: at CHF 26.90 in the first year, Panda is one of the most affordable options on the market. For budget-conscious users seeking solid basic protection without extras, Panda is worth considering. The feature set falls behind premium providers.
AVG and Panda Security are evenly matched.
Both products are evenly matched – the decision depends on your personal requirements.
Our verdict
AVG and Panda Security come out tied at 8.6 out of 10 in our rating. The decision should not hinge on overall score but on your concrete needs.
On price, AVG currently sits at CHF 33 in year one, Panda Security at CHF 27. Watch the renewal price closely: both are transparently listed in the table above and matter more long-term than the introductory price.
Strength profiles: AVG scores highest on protection, Panda Security on price-performance. If you care most about one of those dimensions, the choice is clear. For all-round needs, either product is a safe pick.
Feature-by-feature comparison
| Criterion | AVG | Panda Security |
|---|---|---|
| Real-time protection | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in VPN | Yes | Yes |
| Password manager | No | No |
| Anti-tracking / anti-phishing | Yes | No |
| Parental controls | No | No |
| Identity protection | No | No |
| Low system impact | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Mac, Android, iPhone / iPad | Windows, Mac, Android |
| Number of devices (standard licence) | 10 | 5 |
| System impact in daily use | Moderate | Moderate |